On Thursday 06 October 2005 10:21, Michael Hudson wrote: > Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Have we considered a games track BTW? > > No. Or at least, I hadn't before now.
> Well, do you think you could get talks for this track? As I said, I'd > like to avoid having too many tracks [confusing, etc] I agree with that rationale. How about explicitly including in the scope of the frameworks track (or another, but games frameworks are more generally interesting often I think than people give credence to) to include games integration & games frameworks? The reason I say that is because, for example, Crystalspace provides a python integration, and thus can act as a framework for python programs sitting in a 3D environment (though you could argue it sits elsewhere), and systems like Simon Wittber's lightweight games toolkit As for getting talks? I suspect/hope it should be quite easy :-) What would be nice in many respects is to get people together working on different systems and find ways of integrating between them. Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ EuroPython mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
