Jean-Marc Orliaguet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Hudson wrote: > >>Hum. I guess I prefer the camelcase form for aesthetic reasons, so we >>have an impasse :) Does anyone else care at all? >> > > Michael, do as you please, consistency is most important. I can update > some parts of the site if you need help with it..
I think I got them all, thanks :) Cheers, mwh -- We've had a lot of problems going from glibc 2.0 to glibc 2.1. People claim binary compatibility. Except for functions they don't like. -- Peter Van Eynde, comp.lang.lisp _______________________________________________ EuroPython mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
