Michael Hudson wrote:
> Jacob Hallén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>> fredagen den 17 mars 2006 16.39 skrev Michael Hudson:
>>> I have a slightly tangential question: is it EuroPython or Europython?
>>> I've always tended to the former, but the poster and a few places on
>>> the website say the latter.  Anyone have any strong opinions?
>> The form I have used consistently is Europython. I prefer it before the 
>> camelcase form for aesthetic reasons. 
> 
> Hum.  I guess I prefer the camelcase form for aesthetic reasons, so we
> have an impasse :) Does anyone else care at all?

I often abbreviate EuroPython to EP.  I think the style EuroPython is
more amenable to that than the style Europython.

But I think the style Europython looks more modern and business-like.
It is probably more web 2.0.  The style euroPython would be even more
web 2.0.

-- 
Steve Alexander
(What is "web 2.0" anyway?)
_______________________________________________
EuroPython mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython

Reply via email to