Hi, I would say 'europython' only. The improve list would suggest to me a discussion about improvements; does doing 'stuff' for EuroPython or talking about it == improve?
Cheers Nick On 27 Jan 2011, at 13:26, Fabio Pliger wrote: > 2011/1/27 Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> > On 27/01/2011 13:05, Thomas Waldmann wrote: > Could we please decide on ONE mailing list for this topic? > > (I don't have ep-improve - is it even necessary to have 2 MLs?) > > Agreed, two copies of each email is tedious. :-) > > I agree with that too but some folks follow europython@ and other follow > europython-improve. That's why i posted on both... > > I'm +1 on keep discussions on only one list. Wich one? > _______________________________________________ > EuroPython 2010 - Birmingham, 17-24 July 2010 - http://www.europython2010.eu > EuroPython mailing list > EuroPython@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython -- Nicholas Martin Senior Software Developer Experian pH Royalty Studios | 105-109 Lancaster Road | London | W11 1QF T: 44 (0) 207 598 0346 www.experian.co.uk | www.phgroup.com
_______________________________________________ EuroPython 2010 - Birmingham, 17-24 July 2010 - http://www.europython2010.eu EuroPython mailing list EuroPython@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
