Hi, On 27 January 2011 13:26, Fabio Pliger <fabio.pli...@s3srl.com> wrote: > 2011/1/27 Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> >> >> On 27/01/2011 13:05, Thomas Waldmann wrote: >>> >>> Could we please decide on ONE mailing list for this topic? >>> >>> (I don't have ep-improve - is it even necessary to have 2 MLs?) >> >> Agreed, two copies of each email is tedious. :-) > > I agree with that too but some folks follow europython@ and other follow > europython-improve. That's why i posted on both... > I'm +1 on keep discussions on only one list. Wich one?
europython-improve was started specifically for organisers to work on - 'improve' - the conference. That is the one we should use. The plain europython list is for the conference delegates, many of who seem to have a very low tolerance to email. Already today, with a little flurry on the list, three people have unsubscribed. Many unsubscribed last year in the run-up to EP2010, heaven knows how they thought they could keep in touch with what was happening! Best wishes, John -- > _______________________________________________ > EuroPython 2010 - Birmingham, 17-24 July 2010 - http://www.europython2010.eu > EuroPython mailing list > EuroPython@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython > > _______________________________________________ EuroPython 2010 - Birmingham, 17-24 July 2010 - http://www.europython2010.eu EuroPython mailing list EuroPython@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
