Well I measured back into the pack and at one point the voltage drops down
3.5v on the positive end of the 9th battey and -3.5 on the other side of the
8th battery.  If I jiggle the battery by its strap It goes down to 0v.  The
battery seems clean. But when measured up front when I do the same thing the
voltage goes up to as much as 60v.  I then grounded the B & W charger to the
frame of the car.  The voltage difference from pack to frame jumped up to
75v.  I tried to use the ampmeter.  It caused a ground fault trip on the
charger.  I tried to put an 1156 automotive bulb from positive pack to car
frame.   The first time I got shocked the second it caused another GFI trip
on the charger.  Nothing is connected now except the ground to the frame
from the B & W.  What am I screwing up?  I had the same trouble with my 56
Bug EV.   Lawrence Rhodes......
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawrence Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 1:18 PM
Subject: Not so happy charging. Induction to frame.


> Well everything on the Aspire is hooked up and charging sort of.  I went
> with a higher voltage and blew out all four fuses on the Rudman regs on
the
> negative battery of each 120v string.  I balanced all 30 of the the pots
as
> well as I could to 10.1 v.  Total pack charging voltage of 151.5.  I found
> two batterys at this point that didn't seem to need the regs and put their
> regs on the two negative batterys.  One is solid green but keeping the
> voltage where it is needed.  The other is flickering very fast and keeping
> the voltage also.  I will have to check the un regulated batteries
> carefully.
> There is also induction of 1.3v  and .25v to positive and negative at
rest.
> When tested on charge it was 45v to both sides tested to the frame.  Is
this
> normal?  I haven't hooked up the DC to DC yet and the controller isn't
> hooked to the bat pack yet either.  Should I hook up a light bulb to see
if
> there are any actual amps flowing through?Lawrence Rhodes.....Am I in
danger
> here??????????
>

Reply via email to