On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 18:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ive read a lot of BS about tesla and over unity. I see several things > popped up this year with tom van burean with a patent for a > transformer as well as some french folks with some working on a > similar principle and the aussie people with their generator/electric > motor.
The fact is that only uninformed "followers of Tesla" ever refer to "over unity" devices. As far as I've found, Tesla's (and other physicists') work has never referred to "over unity". It is based on the still incomplete Grand Unified Theory (the one that tries to connect gravitical, electrical, and magnetic energy into one combined formula - and involves some yet undefined source). Sometimes it has been referred to as "free energy", but that is described as energy from that "yet not clearly defined source" - not as energy from nothing. This "not clearly defined source" is called the aether - as referenced in the article. Although I enjoy physics, I'm not a physicist. But I'm quite comfortable with the concept that someday there will be an equation as accepted as E=MC^2 that blows peoples mind as much as that equation did when Einstein first published it. Imagine! Time not being constant! Ludicrous! Well, maybe the speed of light isn't constant, we just can't measure it yet. (BTW, IIRC Einstein came up with that equation while trying to solve the G-U-T) Just because we don't understand - or have complete proof - does not invalidate. It just means we have to wait until someone can finally figure it out, or completely disprove it. (and no, I DON'T believe the Tennessee DeLorean experiment was anything more than BS - hoaxters LOVE Tesla) Until then, we have our batteries... Flame away... Anyway, back to EVs....... TTFN, Lonnie Borntreger
