--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: 3 Oct 2002 18:20:30 -0000
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: failure delivery
> 
> Message from  yahoo.com.
> Unable to deliver message to the following
> address(es).
> 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry, I wasn't able to establish an SMTP
> connection. (#4.4.1)
> I'm not going to try again; this message has been in
> the queue too long.
> 
> --- Original message follows.
> 
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from [63.200.150.3] by
> web20410.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 02 Oct 2002
> 10:19:20 PDT
> Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Lin Tse Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: New battery technology - Nicad still
> looks good
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In-Reply-To:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> Hi David.
> Thanks for computing the following numbers:
> 
> >So, here's the conclusion:
> >
> >Battery  (Cost per kWh delivered over battery
> lifetime)
> >
> >USBMC Golf car lead   ($0.03)
> >Saft NiCd             ($0.24)
> >TS LiIon              ($0.39)
> >Evercell NiZn         ($0.61)
> >Optima YT lead        ($0.58 - $1.31)
> 
> The first number is a little suspicious.  There may
> be
> a slight error
> in the intermediate calculation:
> 
> >US Battery 2200 (from US Battery's web pages)
> >Price ~$50 each in small quantity
> >Mass 28.6kg
> >Capacity 115min @ 75a => 144ah @ 75a => 864 wh
> >Specific energy = 30 Wh/kg
> >Cycle life 550 @ 80% DOD
> >
> >144ah * 6v * 550 cycles = 1815 kWh * 0.8 (DOD) =
> 1452
> kWh total
>                          ^?????????
> >$50 / 1452kWh = $0.03 / kWh
> 
> But, I do agree with your conclusion.  Although
> Nicad's do last a
> long time, they cannot be expected to last 27 years
> under constant
> pounding.  The reason that this can be said with
> confidence is that
> there is another traction application for which
> Nicad's have a long
> track record, and their performance is pretty well
> established.
> 
> One may object that the discharge rates are higher,
> but read the
> fine print.  Overcharging kills Nicad's.  And, EV
> application does
> have a bad track record for overcharging.  Just
> search
> the archives
> on: cook, Zivan, toast, Optima, gassing, battery
> breakfast, etc.
> 
> And, hasn't it been said that "everybody murders
> their
> first pack."
> 
> Here are some resources for those who are interested
> in reading
> further:
> 
> http://www.rcbatteryclinic.com/seminar.htm
> http://www.rcbatteryclinic.com/
> 
> For some real life experiences with lead acid
> batteries and data on
> how many amp hours one can extract from them:
> 
> I am using about 50 amp/hours on a warmish day,
> which
> if my batteries 
> are
> 225 amp/hr. means that I am at approx. 80% DD - or
> am
> I figuring wrong?
> The E-Meter indicates that I am close to that, and I
> have a harder time
> maintaining the 55 MPH speed limit at the end. Most
> of
> my commute is at
> 55 - 60 MPH, with about 4 miles at lower speeds
> through town.
> 
> ...
> 
> I'm using a ADC 9" with an Auburn Scientific Kodiak
> controller, which 
> is
> water-
> cooled.
> 
>  I have a lot of stoplights and stop signs (about 8
> of
> them!), so if I 
> hit
> them all
> wrong (which happens occasionally!), I will have a
> lot
> of 
> accelerations. I
> get up
> to 350 amps on accelerations from a standing stop,
> but
> typically draw 
> less
> than
> 150 when cruising, except toward the end of the run.
> The last several 
> miles
> it
> takes 200 amps or a little more to maintain 55.
> 
> Joseph H. Strubhar
> 
> 
> > Joseph H. Strubhar wrote:
> >
> > >Peter, I am getting only about 20 miles with
> T-105's at 120v - so I 
> think
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com

Reply via email to