http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1103143_tesla-mulls-federal-suit-over-state-franchise-laws-banning-it-from-selling-electric-cars
Tesla mulls Federal suit over state franchise laws banning it from selling
electric cars
Mar 30, 2016  John Voelcker  ht2 Brian Henderson

[images  
http://images.hgmsites.net/med/tesla-store-los-angeles-photo-misha-bruk-mbh-architects_100449435_m.jpg
Tesla Store Los Angeles  / Misha Bruk / MBH Architects

http://images.hgmsites.net/med/state-map-showing-where-tesla-motors-can-blue-and-cant-red-sell-cars-mojo-motors-apr-2015_100508933_m.jpg
State map showing where Tesla Motors can (blue) and can't (red) sell cars  /
Mojo Motors, Apr 2015
]

Coffins made by monks don't often figure into either legal decisions or the
electric car industry, but they do at the moment.

Tesla Motors is weighing whether to sue in Federal court over various state
franchise laws that prohibit it from selling Model S and Model X electric
cars online to buyers.

Its lawyers were inspired by a 2013 legal decision that ruled a monastery
could sell its coffins without requiring a funeral-director's license.

The news comes via a feature story in The Wall Street Journal, in which the
company said it's prepared to take legal action if it feels the need.

For the moment, Tesla is relying on negotiated settlements in various states
that generally permit it to open a specified number of Tesla Stores and
service facilities.

At present, buyers can purchase Tesla cars online in roughly half the United
States, though it is specifically prohibited from selling cars that way in
six states that together represent almost one-fifth of the total U.S. car
market.

Tesla's emergence as a major carmaker selling tens of thousands of cars a
year has brought renewed focus to the often-arcane world of state franchise
laws and the influence of car-dealer lobbyists on structuring those laws.

And the Federal government has started to take notice. Last May, the U.S.
Federal Trade Commission urged Michigan to drop a recently-enacted ban on
Tesla's direct sales.

The agency called the revisions to the state franchise laws, swiftly signed
by governor Rick Snyder, nothing less than "protectionism" for car
dealersthat is "likely harming...competition and consumers."

Michigan Governor Rick Snyder with Ford's steering wheel technology at ITS
World Congress, DetroitMichigan Governor Rick Snyder with Ford's steering
wheel technology at ITS World Congress, Detroit
The FTC had earlier weighed in on state franchise laws that enshrine
independent auto dealerships as the sole legal way that a citizen may
purchase a new vehicle. 

In April 2014, a commentary on its "Competition Matters" blog referred to
the state bans: "In this case and others, many state and local regulators
have eliminated the direct purchasing option for consumers, by taking steps
to protect existing middlemen from new competition."

The Commission called such franchise rules at the state level "bad policy
for a number of reasons."

U.S. laws among different Federal circuit courts currently differ on whether
requiring licensing for new entrants is legal even if the sole reason for
such laws is to protect existing businesses from new competitors.

For now, according to the Journal, Tesla is taking a wait-and-see approach
to any potential restraint-of-trade or "economic liberty" lawsuits.

One factor may be the outcome of Tesla's filing for a dealer license under
the revised Michigan law.
[© 2016 Green Car Reports]




For EVLN EV-newswire posts use: 
http://evdl.org/evln/


{brucedp.150m.com}

--
View this message in context: 
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/Monk-s-coffins-decision-Tesla-Oh-my-tp4681298.html
Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to