There is a thriving business in the USA converting Tesla UMC portable charging 
cables into J1772. Just chop off the plug and attach a J1772 plug. 

I am in Australia and now have a Model S. Tesla use the Mennekes plug which 
supports three phase 230/240/250 volt power that is reasonably common here. It 
also supports single phase charging. 

I have made a J1772 to Mennekes adaptor that works perfectly. I can suck 240 
volts at 32 amps from public charging stations which is handy for holiday trips 
to places where that infrastructure has been supplied by local government. 

I have heard via the local EV association mailing list that several people have 
made the opposite to allow charging of Leafs and iMievs from Tesla destination 
chargers. Given the electricity is supplied by the venues and there are only 
800 Teslas in Australia this doesn't seem unreasonable. 

You need to read through a fair bit of misinformation and irrelevant bumf but 
eventually you get to the bloke at the end who has done it. 

http://forums.aeva.asn.au/forums/tesla-hpwc-adaptor-j1772_topic4834.html 

This is in Australia but I can't see why Tesla would design multiple boards for 
the wall adaptors if they didn't need to.

John Lindsay

> On 20 Apr 2016, at 1:35 PM, Cor van de Water via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I have the suspicion (never even charged at a Tesla station and
> certainly never been exposed to the protocol) that if the engineers at
> Tesla are worth their salt, that even though the chargers are not
> networked, they probably will ask the car to identify itself before
> starting a charging session,
> because without such a handshake, what keeps the world from charging for
> free at the Tesla chargers?
> It is relatively easy to create an asymmetric encrypted authentication,
> whereby you can easily check with the public key that it is a valid
> authentication, without being able to *generate* a valid authentication,
> since that requires the private key. We do this to avoid hackers from
> buying the lowest cost version of our product and upgrading it to a
> higher featured model, since the license key is encrypted in such a way.
> Tesla can generate keys for their vehicles that are used for the
> communication with the chargers (and other identification purposes).
> 
> So, while it may be a great learning experience to try and
> reverse-engineer the Tesla charging protocol in similar way that the
> Leaf was used to record Chademo charging sessions, don't be surprised if
> there are encrypted messages that will prevent you from even playing
> back a recorded charging session to a charging station, to lure it into
> giving you a charge.
> 
> Hope this gives some insight,
> 
> Cor van de Water 
> Chief Scientist 
> Proxim Wireless 
> 
> office +1 408 383 7626                    Skype: cor_van_de_water 
> XoIP   +31 87 784 1130                    private: cvandewater.info 
> 
> http://www.proxim.com
> 
> This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and
> proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you received
> this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any
> unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of
> this message is prohibited.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Brannan
> via EV
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 8:39 PM
> To: brucedp5; Electric Vehicle Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Tesla's (cuckoo) EVSE grants ...
> 
> Sounds like a great opportunity for an entrepreneur - that HPWC coupler
> to
> j1772 adaptor. Kickstarter or indiegogo?
> Tom
> 
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:13 PM, brucedp5 via EV <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> With all the coming election noise, and the possiblity of no more EVSE
>> grants ringing in my ears, on a search I could not find a renewal of
> the
>> U.S. Fed grant to cover some of the cost of installing public EVSE as
>> before.
>> 
>> But I found a self-promo news item touting a business' new EVSE. I
> noticed
>> their EVSE were two (proprietary) Tesla HPWC EVSE, that no other
> plugin but
>> a Tesla EV can use.
>> 
>> I sent a message off to the business' contact (a NJ mall), letting
> them
>> know
>> that non-Tesla drivers are going to feel rebuffed, thus they could
> lose
>> plugin driver business.
>> 
>> They kindly replied letting me know their HPWC EVSE was part of a
> Tesla
>> Destination Charging grant (Tesla paid for it). See
> http://www.teslarati.com/becoming-tesla-destination-charging-participant
> /
>> Becoming a Tesla Destination Charging Participant
>> Feb 25, 2016
>> [link
>> https://teslafactory.wufoo.com/forms/q7b8imo1g0og2v/
>> contact Tesla's Destination Charging program
>> ]
>> 
>> BTW there is no HPWC to j1772 adaptors drivers can buy, so when HPWC
> are
>> installed, j1772 L2 drivers are shut-out. While I am not against
> Tesla,
>> helping to install 'Tesla-only' (proprietary) EVSE is the same problem
>> drivers had back in the late 1990's-on.
>> 
>> GM would almost give away their inductive (proprietary, wireless)
> lpi,spi
>> EVSE, which would displace either one or both of the public EVSE being
>> installed at a host site, paid for with CA DMV fees (many EVSE sites
> had
>> two
>> spi and no conductive avcon EVSE). This cuckoo approach to public EVSE
>> domination ...
>> 
>> [link
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckoo
>> Cuckoo ... Many species are brood parasites, laying their eggs in the
> nests
>> of other species, ... raise their ... young
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brood_parasite
>> ]
>> 
>> is bad for the EV-cause, unless a HPWC coupler to j1772 adaptor is
> made
>> available for plugin drivers to buy. Since HPWC EVSE are
> non-networked,
>> buying an adaptor would be paid off with the free L2 charging.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> For EVLN EV-newswire posts use:
>> http://evdl.org/evln/
>> 
>> 
>> {brucedp.150m.com}
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context:
> http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/Tesla-s-cuc
> koo-EVSE-grants-tp4681606.html
>> Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
>> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20160419/a90a
> 23fc/attachment.htm>
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> 
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to