On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Lee Hart <[email protected]> wrote:
> via EV wrote: > >> On the efficiency side of things, roads already flex when vehicles drive >> over them. Why not harvest that lost energy? >> > > Heat is the "bullshit" detector of such claims. If any significant amount > of energy was being produced by flexing roads, it would show up as a > temperature rise. Since no such rise is detectable, the energy isn't there. > Haven't you seen the road flex when a heavy vehicle drives past? I have, on many occasions. No thermometer necessary. The technology may not exist to harvest this small amount of energy and/or the amount of energy harvested isn't worth the expense but to claim that the energy isn't there is just as silly as saying that tires don't wear out otherwise we would see piles of rubber powder along the roads. It is ignoring the other evidence in favor of only one possible indicator. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20160826/60d3cd7a/attachment.htm> _______________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/ Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
