The Lucas Bedford vans used a sepex motor. Armature control was via an
SCR, with the field driven via a bipolar transistor circuit. Battery
voltage was 216v nominal of 3KQ11 tubular plate lead acid. It was
usually the field controller that


The first version of the Reva G-Wiz is a sepex motor too.

On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 18:46, Lee Hart via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Mr. Sharkey via EV wrote:
> > What we seem to have deduced is that the controller and motor are a
> > matched pair. It seems without doubt that the controller manages the
> > voltage delivered to both the armature and the fields, otherwise the
> > "reverse switch" wouldn't be workable.
>
> Yes, that sounds likely.
>
> > I'd image that the sequence would be something like:
> >
> > 1) accelerator released: controller ready, no field or armature
> > 2) accelerator depressed: full field, armature current limited, probably
> > ramping up.
> > 3) accelerator depressed further, full armature current, full field.
> > This would occur at what I'm calling "idle" speed.
> > 4) at some point, pressing the accelerator further results in the
> > beginning of field weakening while maintaining full armature.
> > 5) release accelerator partially: full armature current, restore field
> > current to a greater level. Regenerative braking proportional to pedal
> > position.
> > 6) completely release accelerator: Well, this is a bit of conjecture.
> > Dropping the armature at any point during deceleration would result in
> > the regenerative braking going away all at once, which might be
> > dangerous if the driver wasn't expecting it, so I'd say that the
> > controller maintains the armature current until the vehicle has slowed
> > to the point where regen is weak or nil, probably the "idle" speed, then
> > it ramps down or cuts the armature current.
>
> That's a good guess. Though, a sepex controller is capable of very
> sophisticated motion control. You don't see sepex in fork lifts very
> often; but you do find them in more sophisticated EVs, and applications
> like cranes and elevators, where the operator wants precise control of
> position, torque, and speed.
>
> My old sepex controller was very crude; but it worked! :-) The armature
> had 4 steps; off, 36v with series resistor, 36v direct, 72v direct. The
> field had a big rheostat in series to the pack (36v or 72v).
>
> When the accelerator pedal was released, the pack was switched to 36v.
> The field rheostat was 0 ohms, so full 36v field. As you pressed the
> pedal, cam switches gave the armature 36v with resistor, then 36v
> without resistor. Above that, the rheostat began increasing resistance
> to weaken the field and speed up the motor. The field got to minimum
> resistance near full throttle. At full throttle, a cam switched the pack
> from 36v to 72v to get "full warp speed".
>
> A characteristic of this setup is that it tried to be a constant-speed
> drive. If I held the pedal in one position, the car tended to go at the
> same speed, drawing a lot more power uphill, and doing regen down hill.
> I didn't want to suddenly push the pedal to a new position, because the
> motor would "fight like hell" to get to the new speed as quick as it
> could. The only thing preventing me from breaking drive shafts or
> getting my teeth planted in the steering wheel was that it was a
> relatively small motor (70 lbs; rated 30v 500a) and a heavy vehicle (a
> 1974 Datsun pickup with a dozen golf cart batteries).
>
> > If, like Lee suggests, it might be a low voltage field, then the
> > controller might have a buck/boost function for the field, which would
> > complicate our armchair diagnosis.
>
> My guess is that they wound the field for some fraction of pack voltage,
> so they didn't need a buck/boost controller. They could get (say) 4x
> field by applying 120v to a 30v field winding.
>
> Your controller just has to be aware of how *long* it can over-voltage
> the field before heating becomes a problem. The field has a lot of mass;
> it can stand large over-voltages for many minutes, and there is usually
> a blower that runs all the time for cooling it.
>
> > I do remember when I was researching the Siemens 1GV series motors last
> > year during my lithium conversion, I ran across some documentation that
> > seemed to show some series field windings along with the shunt/sepex
> > field. The compound field arrangement might be the key to having
> > stall/low RPM torque available so the motor doesn't need to idle.
>
> Yes. The most sophisticated applications for big DC motors are normally
> compound (multiple series and shunt field windings). You can get just
> about any imaginable characteristic just by careful choice of which
> windings are powered. There are also interpoles, which add even more
> possibilities. But that's a whole 'nother topic.
>
> > Thinking about it, it's entirely possible that the SCT developers went
> > with the full-armature/idling motor both because they didn't want to
> > have to build controllers that could handle the armature current, but
> > also because that thought that a car that "idles" would be more
> > intuitive for drivers used to ICE vehicles.
>
> Well, when people convert ICE's with automatic transmissions, they often
> *do* need to keep the motor idling, just to keep they transmission
> pumped up and working. And people have come to expect cars to "creep".
>
> > Earlier this month the local utility contacted me about entering my car
> > in the town's annual Spring parade. I had to decline because idling at
> > 1,800 RPM in first gear results in a ground speed of 9 MPH.
>
> The simple fix is to somehow drop the voltage to the armature. You can
> make a shunt or sepex motor idle at 10 RPM! Full field voltage, and
> something like 2v on the armature. :-)
>
> --
> If you're not stubborn, you'll give up too soon. If you're not flexible,
> you'll pound your head against the wall and miss a different solution.
>         (Jeff Bezos)
> --
> Lee Hart, 814 8th Ave N, Sartell MN 56377, www.sunrise-ev.com
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>


-- 
Paul Compton
www.morini-mania.co.uk
www.paulcompton.co.uk (YouTube channel)
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to