On the flip side, my 2013 is the only model that can be programmed to take an 80%, as opposed to 100 charge, and I’ve only lost 1 power bar in 7 ys. BTW, it’s for sale for 9k in So OR, as I’ve got the hotties to do a Bolt with quite a bit more range. 😉
Sincerely, Bob Bath Note: any misspellings of the contents of this message are due to 54 y.o. vision, hyperactive spell check changing what I typed, or fat fingering— not cluelessness. > On Mar 17, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Mark Abramowitz via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> > wrote: > > Was Nissan trying to scare people when they warned against fast charging too > often? Just CYA? > > - Mark > > Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone > >> On Mar 17, 2020, at 9:36 AM, Peri Hartman via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks ! So, is it reasonably safe to say, especially with Tesla, that the >> BMS is preventing the kind of excess rapid charging demonstrated in the >> article ? It seems preposterous that significant damage is occurring to EV >> batteries. (I know it will cause slow, long term damage.) In which case, the >> article is intended to scare people and, perhaps, funded by you know who. I >> looked at the article again, but there's nothing ominous in the funding list. >> >> Insomnia: I laugh. When I was in high school, if I had insomnia (rarely), I >> remember I simply opened my history book and was asleep in a few minutes. (I >> really enjoy history, now, by the way.) >> >> Peri >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "Peter C. Thompson via EV" <ev@lists.evdl.org> >> To: ev@lists.evdl.org >> Cc: "Peter C. Thompson" <pe...@cruzware.com> >> Sent: 17-Mar-20 8:51:08 AM >> Subject: Re: [EVDL] DC charging damages EV packs (?fact or anti-EV-hype?) >> >>> Ah, finally, an area where I am an expert. :) >>> >>> The communication is defined in ISO 15118-2, the transport layers are in >>> 15118-3 (PLC) and 15118-8 (wifi). No one is using the wifi version for DC - >>> only for wireless power. >>> >>> However, nowhere in the spec does the battery temp get sent. There is a >>> warning when the battery is over temp, but that's about it. >>> Most of the time, the job of protecting the battery is the BMS. The BMS >>> tells the EV-side charger how much power it can accept, and when to >>> throttle power. >>> >>> Part of this is that the OEMs think that any info about the battery is >>> confidential information. Which is why SoC is optional, and not always >>> sent to the charger. >>> >>> And yes, you are absolutely correct, Peri: you DON'T want to read these >>> specs... they are a very good cure for insomnia. >>> >>> Cheers, Peter >>> >>>> On 3/17/20 7:05 AM, Peri Hartman via EV wrote: >>>> Do you know more, yourself ? I don't really want to study the spec :) >>>> Peri >>>> >>>> ------ Original Message ------ > > _______________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub > ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/index.html > INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org > Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA) > _______________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/index.html INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
