I agree about the RF - however, that exact technology hasn't been
disclosed by Tesla - only reverse engineered by some cable manufacturers. :)
However, your second sentence is completely wrong. NACS *IS* CCS - it
was designed that way. The only real difference is that it allows AC and
DC on the same cables.
Cheers, Peter
On 5/17/24 4:13 PM, (-Phil-) via EV wrote:
The RF opening thing is a convenience feature. If it dies, the only thing
that happens is you must (aghast!) open your charge port manually.
If you remove the ridiculously overly complex CCS signalling, the normal
NACS system is beautifully simple. This is one reason why it's so
reliable. Signalling-wise, it's very similar to CHAdeMO.
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 4:09 PM Lee Hart via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
The paranoid engineer in my wonders... will any of this super-complex
over-techie stuff still work in 10 years? Will there be any chance that it
will be repairable?
--
Excellence does not require perfection. -- Henry James
--
Lee A. Hart https://www.sunrise-ev.com
_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20240517/599c2813/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
