I want to echo what Jason says entirely in his position and reasoning.
Either would be fine, but libera.chat has some benefits, both
technical-adjacent and non-technical, IMO.

I would also add that I pretty strongly disagree with the argument
that we should distance ourselves for distance's stake, or to avoid
the appearance of taking sides.  This isn't analogous to a divorce
where we are the children, it's a choice we're making for our project
WRT infrastructure and, all else being equal, the explicitly stated
values of the competing options should be weighed in that decision.

I appreciate libera.chat's more explicit values statement embodied in
the anti-discrimination policy and believe that aligns with the values
of the Evergreen project.  That said, OFTC is a fine choice as well,
and they have taken the recent step of pushing the "private" flag to
all users, forcing users to opt out of some identity-masking features
rather than opt in, which is a good step, I think.

--
Mike Rylander
Research and Development Manager
Equinox Open Library Initiative
1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
work: [email protected]
personal: [email protected]
https://equinoxOLI.org

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 6:29 PM Jason Boyer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Given the last week or so I don’t think there’s any question about whether we 
> should move, only where we should land.
>
> I wouldn’t be upset either way but I lean toward libera.chat for a few 
> reasons:
> 1. Since it is basically all the same staff as freenode they’re used to 
> managing a large network
> 2. With the (very recent) addition of a web interface they’re basically at 
> feature parity with what we expect
> 3. I like the fact that they have anti-discrimination policies as Galen 
> mentioned, and having gone through this ordeal I suspect their management 
> policies will be quite robust.
> 4. Less importantly but still notable, several other FOSS projects have 
> already officially moved there, such as Ansible, PostgreSQL, emacs, ZNC, 
> Code4Lib, and I’m sure several others. Most of these I’ve observed 
> incidentally or saw mentioned elsewhere; I suspect a number of large projects 
> are already represented there should one actually search them out.
>
> Jason
>
> --
> Jason Boyer
> Senior System Administrator
> Equinox Open Library Initiative
> [email protected]
> +1 (877) Open-ILS (673-6457)
> https://equinoxOLI.org/
>
> On May 26, 2021, at 11:21 AM, Galen Charlton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The #evergreen IRC channel has been hosted on the Freenode network for years. 
> However, recently 14 staff members at Freenode have quit in response to a 
> dispute over ownership of the network [1], [2].
>
> A number of open source and other communities, including Code4Lib, have 
> migrated to other IRC networks such as Libera.Chat (which was founded by the 
> departed Freenode staff members) and OFTC (which has been around for years 
> and hosts, among other groups, #koha). However, Freenode has apparently 
> started locking channels that mentioned a move away to Libera in their 
> channel topics. [3]
>
> I believe that the current proprietors of Freenode are actively undermining 
> Freenode as a place for open source communities to discuss their work without 
> interference, though it is not clear to me why they find commercial or other 
> value in doing so. Consequently, I suggest that we consider a move to either 
> Libera.Chat or OFTC. #evergreen channels currently do exist on both networks.
>
> Here are some pros and cons I see:
>
> Libera.Chat
> ---------------
> Pro: Run by the same people who have kept Freenode running smoothly for over 
> a decade. Has a policy against discrimination based on faith, ethnicity, 
> sexual orientation, sex or gender expression, disability, or age. [4]
> Con: Doesn't offer a built-in web client, although it can be used with other 
> web IRC services.
>
> OFTC
> -------
> Pro: Has been successfully used by the Koha community for years. Comes with a 
> built-in web chat client.
> Con: Their policy does not appear to have active anti-discrimination clauses. 
> [5]
>
> I don't believe that this is a super-urgent issue - please enjoy the 
> Evergreen Conference this week! - but I would like to solicit opinions on 
> whether to leave Freenode and, if so, whether to move to OFTC or Libera.Chat. 
> Discussion about the IRC network is taking place on the Freenode #evergreen 
> IRC channel as well.
>
> I want to acknowledge that a discussion of alternatives to IRC would be 
> valid, but I suggest that if anybody wants to take that up, that it be done 
> in parallel to the more limited question about moving #evergreen.
>
> [1] 
> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/05/freenode-irc-has-been-taken-over-by-the-crown-prince-of-korea/
> [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/856543/
> [3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27287750
> [4] https://libera.chat/policies
> [5] https://www.oftc.net/Network_Policy/
>
> Regards,
>
> Galen
> --
> Galen Charlton
> Implementation and IT Manager
> Equinox Open Library Initiative
> [email protected]
> https://www.equinoxOLI.org
> phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
> direct: 770-709-5581
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-general
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-general
_______________________________________________
Evergreen-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-general

Reply via email to