Very Very welcom to New to OS:

Here is the Case Study:

 "Opportunities and Challenges in the Implementation of a Five-Year Strategy 
for a Medical Company" Open Space Meeting

Pain points for a publicly traded company after 18 years of entrepreneurship:

When facing a significant increase in performance targets, organizational 
development needs to keep up with the demand for increased performance. For 
example, the ability of personnel and recruitment speed may not keep up with 
organizational development.

External market changes require new adaptive strategies. For example, US trade 
sanctions and increased demands for the medical industry in China, how to 
prepare in advance to adapt to external market strategies is urgent.

Pressure and internal friction during execution: goal consensus, but clashes in 
executing strategies, clashes between old and new concepts, how to improve 
execution efficiency and increase acceptance of decisions, thereby enhancing 
the overall execution ability of the company.

Solution:

After interviewing the chairman, it was discovered that the chairman has a very 
deep consideration for the future and has a great expectation for the team to 
break through together. He is concerned about the challenges and risks in the 
execution of "strategy implementation." Due to the change in theme, the meeting 
time was adjusted.

The workshop was adjusted from the original 4 hours to 12 hours, and 73 
participants, including executives and sales directors, discussed 24 topics and 
10 action plans.

Workshop summary:

High efficiency: Participants discussed 24 core topics related to strategy 
implementation for 12 hours, which they themselves contributed, and voted on 
urgent and important action items, forming a consensus.

Problems that had not been solved for years were solved on the spot, and some 
participants brought out gauze products for multi-party communication.

Each person had a clear target when they arrived; when they left, they had a 
clear understanding of what they needed to do in the future and how to 
contribute their ideas. The sales manager of the northern region said, "The 
first thing I will do when I go back is to stop and think about my work for a 
day, instead of just knowing how to pull the cart every day." Everyone is 
confident about the goals for the next five years.

Follow-up: In 18 years, the company only achieved a total of 2 billion yuan in 
revenue, and there was no breakthrough in the first year of going public. After 
the open space workshop, their sales in 2020 reached 10 billion yuan.

Insights: Many people think that the reason why this case is so successful is 
due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the company's production of masks. It cannot 
be denied that this is one of the most important reasons. The problem is that 
among so many pharmaceutical companies, why only this company seized the 
opportunity? The reason is simple. The 73 executives reached a consensus on the 
opportunities and challenges of achieving 4 billion yuan in sales in five years 
in the open space strategic workshop, and each executive was clear about their 
role and responsibilities, reducing internal communication friction and finding 
a path to achieve the 4 billion yuan target.

Impact on Audrey: This project greatly inspired me. I was originally going to 
wait five years to see the results, but in just one year, I saw the power of 
open space technology. It also prompted me to want to translate "Wave Rider" as 
soon as possible because I hope that more Chinese business managers can see the 
power of open space. This is also why I am studying the Emba X program at ETH 
Zurich and the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland because I hope to 
introduce open space into the university system and give younger people the 
opportunity to be exposed to open space while studying.

I am writing to you today to share my passion for publishing and my dedication 
to promoting the philosophy of open space. Over the years, I have been involved 
in bringing books from foreign authors to China, including Harrison's works, as 
well as Peggy's "Engaging Emergence," which has already been published in China.


Currently, Sunzanne and I are working on a project titled "The Wisdom and 
Stories of Global Authors," aimed at introducing young readers in China to a 
diverse range of global literature. Our ultimate goal is to spread this 
knowledge and insight to readers all over the world.

To that end, I would like to extend an invitation to you to join us on this 
journey. If you are interested in sharing your wisdom and stories with a 
Chinese audience, I would love to hear from you. Whether it's through 
publishing your books or collaborating on consultancy projects, I am committed 
to connecting you with our team in China to discuss any opportunities that you 
may find exciting.

Thank you for your time, and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

I love you everyone,my OpenSpace family members!-- 

郑晓琼( Audrey Zheng) 

CEO&Founder of Beijing Open Space Technology Co.,Ltd
Global Publisher of Jie Teng Culture Co.,Ltd
ETH Zurich & University of St.Gallen EMBA X 

Email: [email protected]
Twitter:@Audrey_802
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.cn/in/audery-hepburn-openspace-china
Tel:+41 772 355 521


---- Replied Message ----
| From | Harrison Owen SR via OSList<[email protected]> |
| Date | 03/19/2023 20:44 |
| To | Peggy Holman<[email protected]> |
| Cc | Open Space Listserv<[email protected]> |
| Subject | [OSList] Re: Hello Everyone, New to OS |
Jordan -- Some years ago Boeing did a 500 person, multi-site open space for 
everybody who cared about doors. It seems that they needed to redesign the way 
they made doors for their aircraft. Complicated process involving 25,000 people 
in 5 (I think) countries -- and doors are different. What works on a 747 won't 
make it on a 777, etc. Somewhere out there are people who were involved 
directly in all this (I wasn't) -- but I do know folks were pleased.


Harrison


On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 1:59 PM Peggy Holman via OSList <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Welcome Jordan and Raynel!


Raynel, you ask about impactful Open Space experiences. When I ran into Open 
Space in 1995, it changed my work and my life. (Thank you Harrison.) It taught 
me that when I am organizing something, I am not responsible for other people’s 
experiences. My work is to cultivate a space that invites people to show up 
authentically and connect with others. Open Space took me on a journey to learn 
about complexity and what it could teach us about working with disruption in 
human systems, like organizations and communities. That has been central to my 
work ever since.


From Anne Stadler, I learned the essence of open space (not just the 
methodology but the philosophy and life practice) is to take responsibility for 
what you love. Imagine that! How often are we invited to even ask ourselves 
what matters to us, much less spend time with others who care to explore it and 
act on it? To me, that is the heart of why Open Space Technology creates magic. 


It also taught me that breakthroughs emerge when the needs of individuals and 
the whole are both met. It’s when people start talking about “we” without 
sacrificing themselves in the process. That was what hooked me when I attended 
my first Open Space at U S West in 1995. (It’s the one in this video.) I saw 
250 telephone company union workers, managers and others grapple with tough 
issues. At the end of 2.5 days, they were all in agreement: it was time to 
rehab the basic plant. Everyone was shocked that union people and management 
agreed to bring on contract labor (a contentious issue in contract 
negotiations) because it freed employees to do the deeper work. People got 
their needs met and so did the organization. 


Many organizational stories have this sort of breakthrough dynamic.


Jordan, you ask how Open Space translates from ideation to action. I’ll give 
you a consultant’s answer: it depends. What is your purpose for gathering? 
Often, most often I find, Open Space is used to bring together the diversity of 
people who make up a system to explore a complex or conflicted subject. There 
may not be an explicit expectation for action out of the convening. What I do 
find you can reliably expect for outcomes (Excerpt from Engaging Emergence: 
Turning Upheaval into Opportunity):


Individually, we are stretched and refreshed—We feel more courageous and 
inspired to pursue what matters to us. With a myriad of new ideas, and 
confident of mentors, supporters, and fans, we act.



New and unlikely partnerships form—When we connect with people whom we don’t 
normally meet, sparks may fly. Creative conditions make room for our 
differences, fostering lively and productive interactions.

Breakthrough projects surface—Experiments are inspired by interactions among 
diverse people. 

Community is strengthened—We discover kindred spirits among a diverse mix of 
strangers. Lasting connections form, and a sense of kinship grows. We realize 
that we share an intention—a purpose or calling guided by some deeper source of 
wisdom. Knowing that our work serves not just ourselves but a larger whole 
increases our confidence to act.

The culture begins to change—With time and continued interaction, a new 
narrative of who we are takes shape. 




When the focus of a convening is a “now what?” sort of question and the culture 
supports initiative, I find novel, ambitious projects often result. One of the 
challenges in understanding outcomes is beautifully expressed by Tova Averbuch 
in her wonderful book, Initiating and Inviting Generative Change: Entry and 
Contracting for Emergent Outcomes In Results Driven Organizations. In essence, 
since the outcomes aren’t preset, it can be elusive to connect actions with the 
great conversations people have. People often say of Open Space, great 
conversations but nothing happens. She tells a great story of talking with 
someone about taking a new job. They had that "great conversation, no action" 
exchange and then she realized that the creation of the job they were 
discussing came from that Open Space! In her words:

When a result is pre-planned someone holds it long enough to know where it 
originated, or at least so it is perceived. When an outcome is emergent, one of 
two things happen. Either it organically blends into the organization without 
anyone thinking about where it was born. Or, when people are deeply engaged in 
the work, they attribute the outcomes to themselves, their passion, initiative 
and self-organization. They perceive the gathering as an opportunity they were 
lucky to have experienced. Both perceptions are true and show organic ownership.



So there are some thoughts for you Jordan and Raynel.


If you are looking for someone to interview, I am open to doing that for you. 
Just drop me an email and suggest a time or two to talk with your team.


Appreciatively,
Peggy


_________________________________

Peggy Holman
[email protected]
Twitter: @peggyholman

Bellevue, WA  98006
206-948-0432
www.peggyholman.com
www.journalismthatmatters.org

Enjoy the award winning Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval into Opportunity

 
"An angel told me that the only way to step into the fire and not get burnt, is 
to become 
the fire".
  -- Drew Dellinger






On Mar 19, 2023, at 9:15 AM, Jordan Wareham via OSList <[email protected]> 
wrote:



Good afternoon everyone from sunny Florida!

My name is Jordan Wareham and like Raynel, I am a doctoral student in the 
Bowling Green State University program in Organizational Development & Change.

My background has been in commercial aviation. I have been an airline pilot, 
pilot instructor & examiner, and now have spent the last 4 years in management 
with major airlines, currently service as the Director of Safety for an airline 
based in Florida.

I really see tremendous applicability for OpenSpace inside the airline industry 
and I’m looking forward to learning from everyone here.

One question is around some of the mechanics. When it is decided to invoke an 
Open Space discussion, I’m gathering it’s around a central issue. The 
discussion of that issue is what generates the areas that people feel 
passionate about (hope i have it right so far). My understanding is then that 
individuals will take responsibility for championing certain issues and 
everyone will break into working groups…but what happens then? Is it the 
expectation that the working groups will effectively ideate and solve the issue 
and develop action plans? I’m just curious how this translates from ideation 
stage to action items.

Also, wondering if there is someone who might be willing to serve as a “method 
master” for our group to interview and learn from. As part of this semester’s 
class, we are needing to identify individual(s) who can mentor our group 
through an interview process and provide support for questions. I don’t believe 
it would be much time commitment and we would really appreciate learning from 
someone who has been actively applying Open Space in their practice.

Thank you!

Jordan

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]



_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to