WD: > On Thu, Feb 19, 1998 at 05:46:41PM +1000, Mitchell Porter wrote: > > So I stand by my original claim: the many-worlds interpretation > > has not been clearly enunciated. Crucial concepts remain undefined > > in any rigorous way. > > Ok, let me give my understanding of what a "world" is in MWI. Suppose we > take the UWF and consider it as the superposition of two wavefunctions: > > PSI = c_0 PSI_0 + c_1 PSI_1. > > If from examining the time evolution of PSI, we can tell that there is > very little interference between PSI_0 and PSI_1 after time t_1,
Can you define what "interference" means here? -mitch http://www.thehub.com.au/~mitch
