immortality

[jamikes]

--- Charles Goodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of rwas > > > > Eh? If I understood this statement then I must object. I have quite > clear > > memories of before-death, during-death, and after-death. I realize > > that within the context of the narrow communication style > prevailent here that this > > claim means nothing. But your statement  would seem to attempt > rewrite my > > experiences as false by default. > > > > I resent that. > Preempting my question, there was an immediate post: > That's very interesting. What experiences are you refering to? > > Charles [G] Somehow I missed rwas's reply detailing those 'experiences. Could anybody supply them to me? Or perhaps C. Goodwin himself who now wrote:   "Mystic experiences of course. Experiences which have rendered understanding which makes participating in the predominate discourse found on this list very painful to endure. Sequential, temporal, in-the-box thinking is not how to transcend the physical in my view."   Maybe this paragraph is the answer. In which case I rest my case. John Mikes