from George Levy, 1 Jun 2001: > A purely mechanical model no matter how complicated, including random > variables, cannot replicate the results generated by Quantum mechanics + > probability theory. This is exactly what Bell's inequality implies. In > fact Bell proved his inequality using Quantum theory and probability. > Therefore Juergens' erector (fr: meccano) set approach using pseudo-random > generators, would definitely violate Bell's inequality theorem, and would > not be phenomenally or experimentally equivalent to quantum mechanics.
I do not agree, of course. Since you keep insisting on this, I suggest you clearly write down all implicit assumptions and why exactly you believe Bell's inequality is not compatible with pseudorandomness and algorithmic TOEs. http://www.idsia.ch/~juergen/everything/html.html http://www.idsia.ch/~juergen/toesv2/
