Dear Bruno: I remain confident that there is a link between what we both are saying.
I think I must do my homework and closely study your argument. I hope circumstances will allow this. Yours Hal At 7/23/02, you wrote: >At 22:11 -0700 22/07/2002, H J Ruhl wrote: >>Is it possible to sustain a no information Everything if there is a >>selection in which this latter ensemble is the only generators subject to >>such noise? The very concept of any selection within the Everything >>necessarily places information within the Everything and must thus be >>disallowed. > >It is here that the 1-3 distinction, or the comp 1- indeterminacy paves >the way. (If I understand what you say). > >B.
