Dear Saibal Mitra,
I believe you represent the highest scientific level in physical views. This post is not personally
to you, your communication just prompted it - to the list.
It is in my opinion a 20th (2000th?) level consequential sophistication of primitive views,
2D, not even 3D, observing nature not even outside the cave.
I don't believe in atoms, photons, etc., which are ingenius representations of observed
effects in their insufficient view, personalized into pieces of objects in lack of any better in
the ancient observational views. Millennia ago.
Since then the view has not changed, irrespective of our epistemic enrichment.
We still add and add calculalitve newer and newer theories to the ancient dreamed-on views.
The mind (ours, the universe's, whatever) interprets the impact it receives. The newer ones
are complacently fit into the old habits, even squeezed in.
It takes mental power to sever the dependence of the brainwashing of learned tales
and think in new terms.There is IMO sufficient brainpower in this list for such renovative thinking. There were such initiations, there are still going-on topics of the new. Every now and then.
A mirror-restricted symmetry is not the 'new way of thinking'. You did better other times.
Especially not for "particles" of scientific imagination. That we can get in physics class.
Sorry, I hope not to have offended you, all I wanted is to shake up the latent talent to
free-up itself from the complacent slumber.