|
Dear Saibal Mitra,
I believe you represent the highest scientific
level in physical views. This post is not personally
to you, your communication just prompted it -
to the list.
It is in my opinion a 20th
(2000th?) level consequential sophistication of primitive
views,
2D, not even 3D, observing nature not even
outside the cave.
I don't believe in atoms, photons, etc., which
are ingenius representations of observed
effects in their insufficient view,
personalized into pieces of objects in lack of any better in
the ancient observational views. Millennia ago.
Since then the view has not changed,
irrespective of our epistemic enrichment.
We still add and add calculalitve newer and
newer theories to the ancient dreamed-on views.
The mind (ours, the universe's, whatever)
interprets the impact it receives. The newer ones
are complacently fit into the old habits, even
squeezed in.
It takes mental power to sever the dependence of the brainwashing of
learned tales
and think in new terms.There is IMO sufficient brainpower in this list for such
renovative thinking. There were such initiations, there are still going-on topics of the new.
Every now and then.
A mirror-restricted symmetry is not the 'new
way of thinking'. You did better other times.
Especially not for "particles" of scientific
imagination. That we can get in physics class.
Sorry, I hope not to have offended
you, all I wanted is to shake up the latent talent to
free-up itself from the complacent
slumber.
Respectfully
|
- Ordinary atom-mirror atom bound states Saibal Mitra
- Re: Ordinary atom-mirror atom bound states jamikes
- Re: Ordinary atom-mirror atom bound states Russell Standish

