Brent wrote Friday, September 06, 2002 11:48 AM: (Subject: Re: Rucker's Infinity, Tegmark's TOE, and Cantor's AbsoluteInfinity - not a true subject here):
> On 06-Sep-02, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > Dear John, > > Bohm's statement is quite coherent with his philosophy. SNIP > > Bohm's QM is empirically identical with non-relativistic > Schroedinger QM - makes exactly the same predictions. So what > does it have to do with AI and the duplication of brains? > Brent Meeker As Bruno correctly indicated I asked about an observation of Bohm - the openminded philosopher - IMO so different from the professional physicist pictured mostly in his posthumus "writings" (and early ones aswell, before his decade+long philosophical work). My parentetical remark excluding rhythm and quantity indicated only that a correlation of these with numbers does not indicate any natural occurrence of numbers, rather a human attribution - a predicating. I believe the connection to "AI and duplication of brains" is misplaced. I hope the "construction" of Bruno's thesis's English version will come up soon, because I don't trrust my feeble French to read "more about Bohm" - what Bruno indicated to be found in his website. And Brent, thank you for the D.Adams quote. John Mikes
