I post this again to fix a small but important error and to sustain a single thread title.
Proposition 8: The dynamic of Proposition 5 is random.
Proof: Same form of proof as for Proposition 5.
"Effect": I tried here to select a word that encompassed a
sufficiently wide range of influences so that in the end the
Everything/Nothing pair summed up to no net information. One
type of influence between counterfactuals would be where the Everything
contains two logic systems such that in one the statement "A"
is true and in the other the statement "Not A" is true. I
see this as too narrow.
"Noise": In the model, current states of universes are
interpretations of the patterns of the counterfactuals that happen to be
currently on the Everything/Nothing surface. The patterns shift
randomly and a universe has to find a new compatible pattern to
survive. A universe that has rules of state succession that allows
for portions of the new pattern to be determined by the shifting dynamic
- a "Do not care" content to the rules - rather than by the
rules acting on the data of the current state is a universe whose
succession of states is subject to the external random dynamic [external
random oracle] to some degree. This is true noise injection into
"Nesting": I do not see the nesting I arrive at as having
dimensionality or of being in or on a dimension. I see it as rather
an infinite entanglement of potential.