John M wrote: > > As to this list: - so far I missed the > "Ensemble theories of..."< before > the ">everything<", definitely did not associate it with TOE, which I always > looked at with awe, because to draw a TOE we should know "everything" first. > Looking at the progressing epistemic development of our (scientific) > cognitive inventory over the decades (millennia?) our 'everything' is > enriching - new and new elements are discovered in the progress of time, > while a formal TOE, as an 'equation-formulated' (quantized, mathematically > expressed) THEORY would not allow the inclusion of such - (unless maybe with > substantial changes or reformulations). >
TOE should be taken as an oxymoron - so rather than looking on it with awe, for me I take is somewhat "tongue-in-cheek". But yes, this arose as a specific response to Tegmark's proposal of Ensemble theories "as being the TOE". > Now I learned to put a special filter on my mouse - to make any (rare, if > any) comment palatable to the general > audience of this list. The biggest help any particpant can do is think how to describe their ideas in 2-3 sentences :) > > John Mikes > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A/Prof Russell Standish Director High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967, 8308 3119 (mobile) UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965, 0425 253119 (") Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] Room 2075, Red Centre http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks International prefix +612, Interstate prefix 02 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------