Please correct me if I am wrong: Bruno believes that information, for example mathematical concepts and theorems, exist independently of their encoding in some physicsl systems (arithmetic realism); in other words, that the number 4 esists independently of the presence in the physical world of sets of 4 separate objects, or that 2+2=4 is true independently of the possibility to physically verify this with 4 bottlecaps. Eugen believes that mathematics is the physics of bottlecaps, and that information cannot be said to exist if it is not carried by a physical system in the actual world. Are we sure that both mean the same thing by "existence"? By the way I am reading Bruno's thesis, the few pages that I have read are very interesting.
- Re: Is the universe computable? Jesse Mazer
- Re: Is the universe computable? Bruno Marchal
- Re: Is the universe computable? Hal Finney
- Computational complexity of "running"... Eric Hawthorne
- Re: Computational complexity of "runni... Eric Hawthorne
- Re: Computational complexity of "runni... scerir
- Re: Is the universe computable? Jesse Mazer
- Re: Is the universe computable? Hal Finney
- Re: Is the universe computable? Giu1i0 Pri5c0
- Re: Is the universe computable? Bruno Marchal
- Re:Is the universe computable? David Barrett-Lennard
- Re: Re:Is the universe computable? Eric Cavalcanti
- RE: Is the universe computable? David Barrett-Lennard
- Re: Is the universe computable? Eugen Leitl
- RE: Is the universe computable? David Barrett-Lennard
- Re: Is the universe computable? Jesse Mazer
- Kindly unsubscribe please Maragtas S.V. Amante
- How to u-n-s-u-b-s-c-r-i-b-e Benjamin Udell
- Re: How to u-n-s-u-b-s-c-r-i-b-e Silvia Axinescu

