Hi Serafino,
I did not even mention probabilities and you are very right
that they do not operate under the same algebraic rules
as classical probabilities.

My point, if I can break it down a bit, is that the amplitudes
correspond, not to "things" but to processes and that what
the amplitudes let you compute are relative probabilities for
the occurrences of such processes.

QM by itself does not describe the world in terms of "things"
i.e. distinct separable objects such as the ones we see and
manipulate with in our everyday.

Godfrey Kurtz
(New Brunswick, NJ)

-----Original Message-----
From: scerir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:15:14 +0200
Subject: Re: "Naive Realism" and QM

Godfrey writes:
> [...] "at the basis of QM there are amplitudes
> that add, multiply and square". Notice the absence
> of "things"! It is the "things" that ain't there!!!

Not sure I understand. But the usual rule of addition
of probabilities does not apply to quantum probabilities.
This does not mean that the usual rule is wrong.
It means (or it might mean) that quantum systems evolve
via transitions through indeterminate states,
which are different from occurrences of events.

Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection.

Reply via email to