Hi, Le Mercredi 5 Avril 2006 22:07, John M a écrit : > Stephen: > > right on! (onwards, of course). > I did not mention the arts. Express "art" by numbers > and you killed the art.
It is not a question to describe art by numbers... I'd say it is totally unrelated, in a materialistic view don't you think you would kill the art by describing it at molecular interaction level ? The only problem I have with this idea (numbers...) is like I said in the other mail I don't understand where *meaning* come from. We can encode "information" in numbers, but without an observer/person (as Tom said) the information is meaningless... yet Tom said a person is an higher level system. Hmmm so numbers are the primary things that generates person that generates meaning which generates numbers ? (I hope I'm not to unclear) Quentin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
