Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> > it generate the second
> > program, execute the first instruction of the second program, then the
> >  *SECOND* instruction of the first program, then it generates the third one,
> > executing its first instruction, the second instruction of the second
> > program, the *THIRD* of the first and so on ad infinitum.
> I hope everyone has corrected this ,) I apologize for these mistakes/errors ?
> And also if a program has no next instruction, then it simply stop and the UD
> won't execute any instruction of it (after it ended).
> Quentin

Yes.  After I wrote that post, I recognized how a UD works.  Thanks.
My other points/questions still stand.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to