Brent Meeker wrote:
> > For the same reason they are far more Christians than Buddhist. And > > none of your materialist even try to define matter. They take it for > > granted, following mainly Aristotle. Almost all materialist react by > > knocking a table when they want me to realize matter exists. > > But that is consistent. You assume arithmetic is real and so you seek an > arithmetical definition of > matter. A scientists assume the matter gives an operational definition, e.g. > as Vic Stenger does: > matter is what kicks back when you kick it. You cannot criticize people who > don't believe in > Platonia for giving non-platonic definitions. hear,hear! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---