Le 12-juil.-06, à 03:53, Jesse Mazer a écrit :
> Well, I don't think the world obeys mathematical laws because it is
> interacting with platonic forms, any more than I think the world obeys
> law of noncontradiction because it is causally interacting with
> laws of logic. I would say ontology is about the most exhaustive
> list of objective truths, and any entity referred to in this
> exhaustive list
> of objectively true statements "exists" by definition.
Very well said Jesse. It is a very fundamental point.
Even Godel did not entirely understand this for a time, and has been,
at some moment of its intellectual life, tempted by the idea that
mathematician could have a sort sixth sense letting them to apprehend
"physically" platonist truth. But this can be related to its non-comp
earlier temptation. Eventually Godel will see the point:
physicalisation of platonia makes the relation between math and physics
still more impalatable.
In plato it is more simple: the "heaven" is the *intelligible in
principle* realm of forms, and with Plotinus, this is extended up to
the border of the non-intelligible called evil, transcendental
obscurity or ... matter.
This (advanced) remark could help for the arithmetical interpretation
of the Plotinian hypostases.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at