Stathis, excuse my naive ignorance: (below your reply) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stathis Papaioannou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "1Z" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 5:12 AM Subject: RE: Bruno's argument
Peter Jones writes: > > Hmm. Including limitations in time? Yes, if an infinite number of finite computations are run simultaneously on a system with a finite number of physical states. Stathis Papaioannou ------------------------------------- So if I have a system with finite number of physical states, it will take a matching finite number of (base)-computations leaving an infinite number untreated. Out of them I can take a deduction for muiltiplying the finite number of physical states by the finite number of the base-states to get to the total number of computability on that system in parallel - still a finite number. I still have an infinite number of unbtreated cases left. Damn that infinite! Cantor's curse. John M --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
