*I suggest you ask AI's opinion about the assassination, and additionally about Stone's analysis. AG *
On Thursday, September 25, 2025 at 4:40:15 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 8:02 AM Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote: *> his overall claim makes sense* *All stories, if they are any good, make sense; but that is insufficient to determine if they are fiction or nonfiction. * *> Oswald failed the paraffin test, so it's highly unlikely he fired a gun that day.* *Not quite. The paraffin test revealed positive results on Oswald's hands, suggesting the presence of nitrates, which could be from firing a gun. However, a test of his right cheek showed no reaction, making the results inconclusive. And the paraffin test is obsolete because today it is considered unreliable. * *> And of course, the Zapruder film which clearly shows JFK's skull being blow BACK,* *That was explained by Nobel prize winning physicist Walter Alvarez in a paper he wrote in 1976. Here is his conclusion from the abstract: * *"a theoretical and experimental investigation of the "backward snap" of the President's head immediately after he was killed yielded the surprising result that it was consistent with a shot fired from the rear, the speed at which the camera was running, and a previously undetected deceleration of the President's automobile just before the final shot." * *And then Alverez gets more graphic and says this: * *"I differ from most of the critics in that they treat the problem as though it involved only two interacting masses: the bullet and the head. My analysis involves three interacting masses, the bullet, the jet of brain matter observable in frame 313, and the remaining part of the head. It will turn out that the jet can carry forward more momentum than was brought in by the bullet, and the head recoils backward, as a rocket recoils when its jet fuel is ejected."* *And remember Walter Alvarez was not a Roger Stone style crackpot, he was a Nobel Prize winning physicist. * *The full paper can be found here: * *A physicist examines the Kennedy assassination film <https://fisherp.scripts.mit.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/American-Journal-of-Physics-1976-alvarez.pdf>* * > indicating shot from the front, from the grassy knoll.* *Nope. * *> **several** witnesses at the School Book Depository saw Oswald on the 2nd floor, in or near the lunchroom, at the time JFK was murdered.* *Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable, especially when a highly emotional event is involved. And the lunchroom was very near the spot where the gun was fired. * *> And we mustn't ignore the deathbed confession of Trafficante* *Right, if you can't trust a mafia boss to tell the truth who can you trust? * * John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* wah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/446a6950-cdd3-44c3-9e8c-18e9921379d5n%40googlegroups.com.
