On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 2:12 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
*> For example, Stone says that the two mob bosses....* *At that point if you know anything about Roger Stone there would be no reason to keep reading. Roger Stone has a long history of lying, he has zero credibility and therefore a logical person should not pay the slightest bit of attention to anything he says. It's very easy for him or for anybody to make noises with their mouth, but some people have a reputation for credibility and some people do not.* * It would be different if Stone were presenting a logical argument but that's not what he's doing, he's claiming he has new evidence, he's claiming he knows what two bosses conspired to do in private, but I have no way of knowing if those two mob bosses actually did what Stone claims they did, and given his reputation I would judge that to be extremely unlikely. * *John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* oko > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0G1knHcziX0upX1CF87GsODFsE%3Du1T4UHTG2rDo1ayqA%40mail.gmail.com.
