On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 6:47 AM Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Consequences of Undecidability in Physics on the Theory of Everything
>
>      Mir Faizal 1 Lawrence M Krauss 2 Arshid Shabir 3 Francesco Marino 4
>
> General relativity treats spacetime as dynamical and exhibits its breakdown 
> at singularities‎. ‎This failure is interpreted as evidence that quantum 
> gravity is not a theory formulated {within} spacetime; instead‎, ‎it must 
> explain the very {emergence} of spacetime from deeper quantum degrees of 
> freedom‎, ‎thereby resolving singularities‎. ‎Quantum gravity is therefore 
> envisaged as an axiomatic structure‎, ‎and algorithmic calculations acting on 
> these axioms are expected to generate spacetime‎. ‎However‎, ‎Gödel’s 
> incompleteness theorems‎, ‎Tarski’s undefinability theorem‎, ‎and Chaitin’s 
> information-theoretic incompleteness establish intrinsic limits on any such 
> algorithmic program‎. ‎Together‎, ‎these results imply that a wholly 
> algorithmic “Theory of Everything’’ is impossible‎: ‎certain facets of 
> reality will remain computationally undecidable and can be accessed only 
> through non-algorithmic understanding‎. ‎We formalize this by constructing a 
> “Meta-Theory of Everything’’ grounded in non-algorithmic understanding‎, 
> ‎showing how it can account for undecidable phenomena and demonstrating that 
> the breakdown of computational descriptions of nature does not entail a 
> breakdown of science‎. ‎Because any putative simulation of the universe would 
> itself be algorithmic‎, ‎this framework also implies that the universe cannot 
> be a simulation‎.
>
> https://jhap.du.ac.ir/article_488.html
>
> I just saw this article, which on the face of it, looks highly
> relevant to this group. I haven't read it, so can't comment yet.
>

Interesting. Here's a press release:
https://news.ok.ubc.ca/2025/10/30/ubco-study-debunks-the-idea-that-the-universe-is-a-computer-simulation/

I agree that the whole of reality is computationally undecidable but I
don't think this "proves" that the universe cannot be a simulation,
the question is not even well posed.

> --
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr Russell Standish                    Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
> Principal, High Performance Coders     [email protected]
>                       http://www.hpcoders.com.au
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/aQRNabuZhYTBJDoF%40zen.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAKTCJyfMe%3DQXgg%3DbbUAfqNi3kSvTH8iPObKDZf83KPbHNAP6Jg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to