Peter Jones writes:

> A claim about truth as opposed to existence cannot
> support the conclusion that matter does not actually exist.

It can if you can show that the mental does not supervene 
on the physical. This is far from a generally accepted fact, 
but there but I am not yet aware of convincing arguments 
against the sort of challenge posed to the supervenience 
theory by eg. Tim Maudlin - unless you reject computationalism.

Stathis Papaioannou

Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to