Peter Jones writes (quoting SP):
> > I've never really understood why computationalists insist that a system
> > must be able to handle counterfactuals in order for consciousness to occur,
> I've explained that several times: computer programmes contain
> if-then statements.
> > other than that otherwise any physical system could be seen as implementing
> > any computation, which does not seem to me a good reason. In any case,
> > Maudlin shows that the requirement for handling counterfactuals leads to
> > a situation where of two systems with identical physical activity, one is
> > conscious and the other not.
> If two systems differ counterfactually, they are not physically
What about an inputless computer program, running deterministically like a
Would that count as a program at all, and could it be a conscious program,
computationalism is true?
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at