David Nyman wrote:

> This isn't a surprise surely, because 'matter' is defined purely
> relationally as behaviour.

By whom ?

>I just can't
> see, except in 'as if' mode, how AR truly serves as 'ontic ground zero'
> in this 'maximally serious' sense.

Some of us think matter does...

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to