Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> Brent Meeker writes:
>>Almost is not completely.  In any case, I don't think consciousness is 
>>indefinitely with no inputs.  I think a "brain-in-a-vat" would go into an 
>>loop without external stimulus.
> That's an assumption, 

No, it has empirical support. It is what is reported by people in extended 
deprivation experiments.

>but even if true it would only say something about the 
> nature of human brains. It is easy enough to imagine a brain with 
> self-excitatory 
> neurons that provide the same kind of input as the environment does, 
> modulating
> their activity in response to feedback from other neurons. It would just be a 
> technical problem to ensure that it didn't go into an endless loop.

Without inherent (quantum) randomness?  I don't think so.  Close deterministic 
systems have a Poincare return time.

Brent Meeker

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to