Jason writes:
> A given piece of data can represent an infinite number of different
> things depending on the software that interprets it.  What may be an
> mp3 file to one program may look like snow to an image editor.

I'm doubtful that you could find a string of any significant length which
both sounds like sensible music and looks like a realistic picture. I'm
even more doubtful that the enormous length of the data that would
represent the brain activity associated with an observer-moment could
be meaningfully interpreted as anything else.

My guess is that sufficiently long, meaningful data strings have
their meaning implicitly within themselves, because there is no
reasonable-length program that can interpret them as anything else.

Hal Finney

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to