Hi Bruno,

> I don't understand what you mean by computations being infinitely far  
> away. In the UD deployment, which I will wrote UD*, all computations  
> begins soon or later (like all dominoes falls soon or later in the  
> infinite discrete dominoe-sequences). All computations reach any of  
> their relative computational state soon or later always after the UD  
> makes a finite number of steps.
 > Hmmm... The phrasing "reconstitution at infinity" does not make sense,
 > I think. All reconstitutions are done after a finite number of steps
 > of the UD. But you are right that for (the third person description)
 > of the first person probable experience we have to take into account
 > the infinite union of the computations going through the relevant
 > state. The reals appears here and now, because they are generated at
 > the limit, as a infinite union of finite computations, or finite
 > pieces of infinite computations.
 > OK. But it is the union which is infinite. The reconstitution can be
 > numbered (by a God).

Yes, I see we agree - my fault. I meant the infinite union of 
computations - maybe "rec. at infinity" was a bit dramatic way of 
speaking - the way you put it is clearer.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to