> SBJ: Information entropy of physical fundamental constants
> The fundamental constant can be measured increasingly accurate, it
> does not seem (for me) that the repetitive pattern of rational
> numbers after some number of digits may take place;
Physical measurements are always relative, i.e. one quantify is measured in
units of another quantity. It is generally thought that there is a smallest
possible unit, the Planck scale, so all physical measurements will be rational
numbers (integers in Planck units).
>if it is the case
> then there is not enough "room" in the universe / multiverse to
> accommodate such information as exact representation of fundamental
> constant - just in principle, there is no way to have it exact as
> there is no way to write down an exact arbitrary irrational number and
> it is not a technical limitation it is a fundamental limitation unless
> it may be represented as a rational number ;o).
There is no problem writing down irrational numbers: sqrt(2), pi,... See
to it. ;-)
Of course from an information standpoint you want to know their bits. But it
also easy to write down a quite short program that will compute whatever bit
want to know for those irrational numbers. But you are right that for almost
all real numbers is impossible to give them a finite representation. But why
believe in those numbers anyway, they are convenient fictions.
> can be measured as an average number of bits per symbol/digit encoded
> by rank-0 context model + entropy encoder (let say arithmetic
> encoder). Therefore, there are two distinct possibilities: entropy
> equals zero or Log2(10) (for decimal representation) or simply: ZERO
> or NON-ZERO. I have my ideas how NON-ZERO case may workout but I'm
> interested to listen others opinions.
Most cosmogonies assume the (microscopic) entropy of the universe is zero. It
started at the Planck scale, where there is room for at most one bit and since
QM insists on unitary evolution the entropy cannot change (as measured at the
Planck scale). The increase in entropy we see is due to our coarse graining,
as Bruno would say, "above our substitution level". It is impossible to
to use the negative information to get back to local zero because the expansion
of the universe has carried the correlations beyond the relativistic horizon.
At least that's the common theory.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at