David Nyman wrote: ... > Now, you don't of course have to accept COMP. But if you want to be a > physical realist, it means you can only hang on to the computational > explanation of mind by eliminating the mind itself from reality. > Personally, not being committed to such an explanation, this doesn't > in itself constitute my problem with current physical accounts. The > alternative is rather that physics as an account of mind must be > incomplete, or else it is wrong. But that's another story.
Is the physics account of life incomplete or wrong? Do you consider "life" to have been eliminated? Brent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
