ronaldheld wrote: > arXiv.org/abs/0909.1508 > I saw the title and thought of what Bruno would make of it. Any > thoughts? > The authors write, "However, recent studies lead to the conclusion that the human mind is not a classical computer, and, in general, not completely reducible to any kind of computer (not even classical) because of the non-algorithmic nature of some mental processes." But they give to no reference to these "recent studies". The paper seems to be about well known problems in training artificial neural networks and other artificial learning algorithms. Sure EEG is inadequate to define "intention", there's just not much information there. I don't see that as having any foundational implications.
Brent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
