I have problems accepting some of these approaches. It seems that he
mostly uses QM without really considering GR. Without a proper theory
of Quantum Gravity, it is difficult to know what approach yields
correct results.

On Dec 9, 1:40 pm, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 09 Dec 2009, at 11:25, ronaldheld wrote:
> > Anyone want to give this a try and comment?
> >  http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0912/0912.0808v1.pdf
> He cites only Isham (very good book, by the way), for the non collapse  
> view. it may be interesting to describe the crystallization in that  
> setting. The wave collapse is never properly defined.
> Bruno
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to