I have problems accepting some of these approaches. It seems that he
mostly uses QM without really considering GR. Without a proper theory
of Quantum Gravity, it is difficult to know what approach yields
On Dec 9, 1:40 pm, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 09 Dec 2009, at 11:25, ronaldheld wrote:
> > Anyone want to give this a try and comment?
> > http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0912/0912.0808v1.pdf
> He cites only Isham (very good book, by the way), for the non collapse
> view. it may be interesting to describe the crystallization in that
> setting. The wave collapse is never properly defined.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at