Hi David,
It looks not so bad :)
At first sight it is based on the ASSA (absolute self-samplings, like
in the doomsday argument; may be Russell can comment on this). He
seems naïve on the identity thesis, but that could be a reduction ad
absurdum. The use of classical chaos is interesting, but not
completely convincing, I might think on it. Will take a deeper look
later. Thanks,
Bruno
On 25 Aug 2011, at 00:12, David Nyman wrote:
This paper presents some intriguing ideas on consciousness,
computation and the MWI, including an argument against the
possibility of consciousness supervening on any single deterministic
computer program (Bruno might find this interesting). Any comments
on its cogency?
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0208038
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/AyiMzznp-hIJ
.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
