On Friday, December 14, 2012 2:00:47 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > On 12/14/2012 6:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > It is in the nature of outer messages that they are not conveyed in any > explicit language. To find an explicit language in which to convey outer > messages would not be a breakthrough� it would be a contradiction in > terms! > > > But from the outside we can determine when a message is passed by > observing actions.� This is how we've come to understand some of the > language of animals.� The 'outer messages' are not explicit language > because they are implicit in actions.� We tend to forget this because > humans do so much internal thinking in language relative to their actions - > but ultimately meaning is grounded in relations to the world.� Because > other humans are such a big part of our world and we mainly interact with > them by language, we start to think of meaning and language as existing in > a separate world. >
I agree mostly, but I would point out that although we can determine when a message is passed, we can't be sure that a message is not being passed. We infer messages from observing behaviors which are familiar to us, but there be much more going on than we would know to imagine. How much could an alien with a telescope learn by looking at your behavior - or maybe he is only looking at your car and assumes that you are some kind of symbotic assistant? All of that in the quote is Hofstader's writing, btw. Only the comment at the end is mine. Craig > > Brent > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/KLSxy_cW49UJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
