Hi Brian Tenneson 

Tegmark has many many good ideas, but I am not a believer in multiverses,
which only a strict mechanistic 19th century type can believe.  

Multiverses defy reason. Just off the top of head:

1) For one reason because of Occam's razor: it is a needless complication,
and the universe (or its Creator) does not do needless things,
because IMHO the universe is purposeful. 

2) "Purposeful" meaning that Aristotle's end causes are needed for a 
final collapse, as they are for life, which is not mechanistic. 

3) As in life/mind/consciousness/intelligence, which  are also purposeful. 

4) In order for there to be multiple universes, there would
have to be multiple platonic Ones. But there can only be one One.

5) Multiverses are mechanistic and so in spacetime, but consciouss life 
and all that other good stuff are outside of spacetime.  Would the 
minds of multiverses be mashed together ?  And all particular lifes 
would have to terminate at the same time.

6) There is no non-Boltzmann physics which is required for a final collapse.
Time has to begin to travel backwards as things reorganize,
in which case the final collapse should be a reflection of the initial 
creation. 
That would be cool.

7) But each universes being differemnt, they would not be expected to
all terminate at the same time.

8) One might conjecture also that the presence of life, consciousness and
intelligence (which are all individual, personal, subjective) are not
mechanical and so cannot be part of a multiverse. It's each man
for himself.  Along these lines, because of natural selection and
different worlds not being all the same, evolution would not occur
in parallel. 

9) Besides, there are alternate possibilities for a quantum wave collapse. 

10) In a related matter, one of the multiverse sites cited William James
as a proponent. Because of his pragmatism, his multiverses arise
because there is no fixed general in pragmatism for each particular.
There are as many generals (additional universes) as you can think of.
These obviously would not be parallel.


[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/25/2012 
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen

----- Receiving the following content ----- 
From: Brian Tenneson 
Receiver: everything-list 
Time: 2012-12-24, 13:11:46
Subject: Re: Fw: the world as mathematical. was pythagoras right after all ?


What do you think of Tegmark's version of a mathematical Platoia?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/6WzRUmWbHY0J.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to