On 22 Jan 2013, at 21:49, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Craig Weinberg
That doesn't have anything to do with your straw man of my
position. I have
never once said that existence is contingent upon human
state again and again that it is experience itself - the capacity for
sensory-motor participation which is the progenitor of all possible
'existence'. Something 'being' means that there is an experience,
there is no possibility of anything ever coming into being.
However, in a static Block MWI Universe there is no need for time or
consciousness or experience. That seems to be Bruno's multiverse.
Although I wonder if his 1p perspective is equivalent to your
motor-sensory experience in order to make time,& consciousness
I think so. In earlier presentations I said that comp can make a
bridge between Cantor realism and Brouwer idealism/intuitionism/
constructivism. But I eventually realize that when people hate other
people, they all hate even more the diplomats and the bridge. But a
lot of the Heraclitean insight does make sense in the parmenidean
realm once we recognize the unavoidability of the first person
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at