On 1/27/2013 10:04 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, January 27, 2013 12:46:13 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
On 1/27/2013 12:39 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, January 26, 2013 11:15:54 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul
On 1/26/2013 9:52 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> If you are born in bondage to a powerful social system, how
> going to defend yourself? It's not even about defense, it's
> economic control. If the only way to make enough money to
> in perpetual debt is to already be wealthy, then how are
you going to
> 'defend yourself'?
You where saying?
So the debt increased around three times as much under
Republicans than under Democrats since Carter. Not that I think
the Democrats are so great, I just find it interesting that to me
the only possible appeal of Republican politics is economic, but
their policies seem to have the worst economic effects.
When you have an economic catastrophe on the scale of the 1930's
or 2000's, the government has to ring up a huge amount of debt
one way or another to make up for all of the money that the banks
stole to prevent social collapse. These market abuses are the
fault of Dems as well as Reps, but certainly it seems like the
professed positions of the Reps, toward market deregulation, are
to be avoided going forward if we don't want to repeat the cycle
LOL, I am not going to defend any administration. Only
Governments can print and issue money... Hi, fellow debt slaves.
Do most people owe their debt to the government or to private banks?
Hello 30 year fixed and 19% interest credit cards.
Mortgage: "from Old French morgage (13c.), mort gaige, lit. "dead
pledge" (replaced in modern Frech by hypothèque), from mort "dead"
(see mortal (adj.)) + gage "pledge" (see wage (n.)). So called because
the deal dies either when the debt is paid or when payment fails. Old
French mort is from Vulgar Latin *mortus "dead," from Latin mortuus,
pp. of mori "to die" "
Governments issue made up money to banks. Banks issue real life
enforceable debts to the servants. When banks pocket all of the money
instead of loaning it out, the gov gives them more. When people
default on their loans to the bank, it is treated as a crime.
A government can cancel all debts held by banks and can tax and
increase interests rates or anything else it desires modulo the ability
of the people to do something about it. The power to destroy is the
power to control, this absolves banks ultimately. But this has diverged
from the topic a bit. It is people that make up banks and governments
and corporations, and it is people that are responsible as only they
have free will. Collecting subsets of people into different groups is a
nice way to absolve one group of people of blame.
What I really what to know is: what motivates the need to find
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.