The argument below, based on the metaphysics of Leibniz, suggests  that 

a) Mental acts such as thinking are primarily driven by final causes, while

b) The actions of physical bodies are primarily driven by efficient causation.

[The current heated debate as to whether evolution is purposeful or not
is just plain silly, as shown below, because life HAS to be to some extent 

Rocks vs flowers: Efficient causation vs purposeful causation

According to Aristotle (and Leibniz) there are at least two forms of causation:

(a) efficient causation, which is deterministic and is represented by 
mechanical laws
    It is metaphorically like being pushed from the past. So here time flows 

(b)  final causation, which is puposeful and goal-oriented, which is 
represented by living bodies.  
    It is metaphorically like being pulled into the future. So here time flows 

That efficient causation exists is given by Newton's Laws.

That final causation exists is demonstrated by our ability to perform 
intentional or purposeful acts
    and by the survival of animals.

Leibniz believed that most actions of living being are combinations of these 
two forms of action,

    that nature and the preexisting harmony insures that there is no conflict 
between the tow.

For a more complete discussion of these topics, see:

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
For more options, visit

Reply via email to